<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Women and Cars	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://glamourdaze.com/2009/01/women-and-cars.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://glamourdaze.com/2009/01/women-and-cars.html</link>
	<description>Vintage Fashion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack R		</title>
		<link>https://glamourdaze.com/2009/01/women-and-cars.html#comment-21</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=235#comment-21</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had a 59 Dodge, bigger fins and the push button configuration was a bit different.  Worked really well except that there was no park. You had to use a handbrake]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a 59 Dodge, bigger fins and the push button configuration was a bit different.  Worked really well except that there was no park. You had to use a handbrake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 50sgal		</title>
		<link>https://glamourdaze.com/2009/01/women-and-cars.html#comment-2</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[50sgal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=235#comment-2</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[oooh, the &#039;56 Dodge, I guess I have that to look forward to next year! It&#039;s funny how much more modernly sexy the 1920&#039;s ad is compared to the 56 ad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oooh, the &#8217;56 Dodge, I guess I have that to look forward to next year! It&#8217;s funny how much more modernly sexy the 1920&#8217;s ad is compared to the 56 ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
